123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277 |
- // Copyright 2008, Google Inc.
- // All rights reserved.
- //
- // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
- // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
- // met:
- //
- // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
- // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
- // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
- // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
- // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
- // distribution.
- // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
- // contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
- // this software without specific prior written permission.
- //
- // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
- // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
- // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
- // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
- // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
- // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
- // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
- // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
- // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
- // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
- // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
- // Implements class templates NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock.
- //
- // Given a mock class MockFoo that is created using Google Mock,
- // NiceMock<MockFoo> is a subclass of MockFoo that allows
- // uninteresting calls (i.e. calls to mock methods that have no
- // EXPECT_CALL specs), NaggyMock<MockFoo> is a subclass of MockFoo
- // that prints a warning when an uninteresting call occurs, and
- // StrictMock<MockFoo> is a subclass of MockFoo that treats all
- // uninteresting calls as errors.
- //
- // Currently a mock is naggy by default, so MockFoo and
- // NaggyMock<MockFoo> behave like the same. However, we will soon
- // switch the default behavior of mocks to be nice, as that in general
- // leads to more maintainable tests. When that happens, MockFoo will
- // stop behaving like NaggyMock<MockFoo> and start behaving like
- // NiceMock<MockFoo>.
- //
- // NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock "inherit" the constructors of
- // their respective base class. Therefore you can write
- // NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock where MockFoo
- // has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), for example.
- //
- // A known limitation is that NiceMock<MockFoo>, NaggyMock<MockFoo>,
- // and StrictMock<MockFoo> only works for mock methods defined using
- // the MOCK_METHOD* family of macros DIRECTLY in the MockFoo class.
- // If a mock method is defined in a base class of MockFoo, the "nice"
- // or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler.
- // In particular, nesting NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock is NOT
- // supported.
- // IWYU pragma: private, include "gmock/gmock.h"
- // IWYU pragma: friend gmock/.*
- #ifndef GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
- #define GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
- #include <cstdint>
- #include <type_traits>
- #include "gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h"
- #include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h"
- namespace testing {
- template <class MockClass>
- class NiceMock;
- template <class MockClass>
- class NaggyMock;
- template <class MockClass>
- class StrictMock;
- namespace internal {
- template <typename T>
- std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const NiceMock<T>&);
- template <typename T>
- std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const NaggyMock<T>&);
- template <typename T>
- std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const StrictMock<T>&);
- std::false_type StrictnessModifierProbe(...);
- template <typename T>
- constexpr bool HasStrictnessModifier() {
- return decltype(StrictnessModifierProbe(std::declval<const T&>()))::value;
- }
- // Base classes that register and deregister with testing::Mock to alter the
- // default behavior around uninteresting calls. Inheriting from one of these
- // classes first and then MockClass ensures the MockClass constructor is run
- // after registration, and that the MockClass destructor runs before
- // deregistration. This guarantees that MockClass's constructor and destructor
- // run with the same level of strictness as its instance methods.
- #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MINGW && \
- (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__clang__))
- // We need to mark these classes with this declspec to ensure that
- // the empty base class optimization is performed.
- #define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS __declspec(empty_bases)
- #else
- #define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS
- #endif
- template <typename Base>
- class NiceMockImpl {
- public:
- NiceMockImpl() {
- ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this));
- }
- ~NiceMockImpl() {
- ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this));
- }
- };
- template <typename Base>
- class NaggyMockImpl {
- public:
- NaggyMockImpl() {
- ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this));
- }
- ~NaggyMockImpl() {
- ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this));
- }
- };
- template <typename Base>
- class StrictMockImpl {
- public:
- StrictMockImpl() {
- ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this));
- }
- ~StrictMockImpl() {
- ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this));
- }
- };
- } // namespace internal
- template <class MockClass>
- class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NiceMock
- : private internal::NiceMockImpl<MockClass>,
- public MockClass {
- public:
- static_assert(!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
- "Can't apply NiceMock to a class hierarchy that already has a "
- "strictness modifier. See "
- "https://google.github.io/googletest/"
- "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy");
- NiceMock() : MockClass() {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
- // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing
- // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected
- // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first.
- // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be
- // made explicit.
- template <typename A>
- explicit NiceMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
- NiceMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
- : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
- std::forward<An>(args)...) {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- private:
- NiceMock(const NiceMock&) = delete;
- NiceMock& operator=(const NiceMock&) = delete;
- };
- template <class MockClass>
- class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NaggyMock
- : private internal::NaggyMockImpl<MockClass>,
- public MockClass {
- static_assert(!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
- "Can't apply NaggyMock to a class hierarchy that already has a "
- "strictness modifier. See "
- "https://google.github.io/googletest/"
- "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy");
- public:
- NaggyMock() : MockClass() {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
- // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing
- // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected
- // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first.
- // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be
- // made explicit.
- template <typename A>
- explicit NaggyMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
- NaggyMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
- : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
- std::forward<An>(args)...) {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- private:
- NaggyMock(const NaggyMock&) = delete;
- NaggyMock& operator=(const NaggyMock&) = delete;
- };
- template <class MockClass>
- class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS StrictMock
- : private internal::StrictMockImpl<MockClass>,
- public MockClass {
- public:
- static_assert(
- !internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(),
- "Can't apply StrictMock to a class hierarchy that already has a "
- "strictness modifier. See "
- "https://google.github.io/googletest/"
- "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy");
- StrictMock() : MockClass() {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using
- // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing
- // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected
- // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first.
- // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be
- // made explicit.
- template <typename A>
- explicit StrictMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An>
- StrictMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args)
- : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2),
- std::forward<An>(args)...) {
- static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass),
- "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding");
- }
- private:
- StrictMock(const StrictMock&) = delete;
- StrictMock& operator=(const StrictMock&) = delete;
- };
- #undef GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS
- } // namespace testing
- #endif // GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_
|